{"id":23310,"date":"2018-07-27T09:06:18","date_gmt":"2018-07-27T07:06:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/"},"modified":"2018-07-27T09:06:18","modified_gmt":"2018-07-27T07:06:18","slug":"decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/","title":{"rendered":"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On which version should presumption of conformity be based? A <span style=\"color: #424242;\">judgment of the general court, called <\/span><span style=\"color: #333333;\">Global Garden, <\/span>gave the answer.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p> This judgement reaffirmed that it is the European Commission&#8217;s decision to publish the reference of the harmonised standard in the Official Journal of the European Union which gives the standard a legal value enabling manufacturers to benefit from the presumption of conformity with the essential requirements of the regulations.<\/p>\n<p> The Court then points out that the revision of a directive does not automatically entail the cancelling of the citation in the Official Journal of all the harmonised standards related to it. The judges note that the legal vacuum created by such a mechanism would not be acceptable. Furthermore, unless explicitly decided by the European Commission, a harmonised standard continues to give presumption of conformity until its date of withdrawal, even if a new version of that standard has already been cited.<\/p>\n<p> Faced with objections pointing out that an earlier version of a standard may for example have lower requirements in terms of safety, the Court replies that it is the European Commission&#8217;s responsibility in such cases to encourage the adoption and rapid citation of a new harmonised standard.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d0f130dadec511d9d258497c9568b79d1b4ea39d.e34KaxiLc3eQc40LaxqMbN4Pb3mRe0?text=&amp;docid=187179&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=EN&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=491203\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Read the judgment<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On which version should presumption of conformity be based? A judgment of the general court, called Global Garden, gave the answer.&nbsp; This judgement reaffirmed that it is the European Commission&#8217;s decision to publish the reference of the harmonised standard in the Official Journal of the European Union which gives the standard a legal value enabling&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[908],"class_list":["post-23310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-standardization"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard - Eurogip<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard - Eurogip\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On which version should presumption of conformity be based? A judgment of the general court, called Global Garden, gave the answer.&nbsp; This judgement reaffirmed that it is the European Commission&#8217;s decision to publish the reference of the harmonised standard in the Official Journal of the European Union which gives the standard a legal value enabling...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Eurogip\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-27T07:06:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Thomas\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Thomas\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Thomas\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/478499d13e0791bfc0d20c6b3583da6b\"},\"headline\":\"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-27T07:06:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":221,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Standardization\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\\\/\",\"name\":\"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard - Eurogip\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-27T07:06:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/478499d13e0791bfc0d20c6b3583da6b\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Eurogip\",\"description\":\"Comprendre les risques professionnels en Europe\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/eurogip.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/478499d13e0791bfc0d20c6b3583da6b\",\"name\":\"Thomas\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1d4c181e1a496d3d6d25441adb6830a23883e0f93ed97a30e4616fea3c950268?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1d4c181e1a496d3d6d25441adb6830a23883e0f93ed97a30e4616fea3c950268?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1d4c181e1a496d3d6d25441adb6830a23883e0f93ed97a30e4616fea3c950268?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Thomas\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard - Eurogip","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard - Eurogip","og_description":"On which version should presumption of conformity be based? A judgment of the general court, called Global Garden, gave the answer.&nbsp; This judgement reaffirmed that it is the European Commission&#8217;s decision to publish the reference of the harmonised standard in the Official Journal of the European Union which gives the standard a legal value enabling...","og_url":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/","og_site_name":"Eurogip","article_published_time":"2018-07-27T07:06:18+00:00","author":"Thomas","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Thomas","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/"},"author":{"name":"Thomas","@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/478499d13e0791bfc0d20c6b3583da6b"},"headline":"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard","datePublished":"2018-07-27T07:06:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/"},"wordCount":221,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Standardization"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/","url":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/","name":"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard - Eurogip","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-27T07:06:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/478499d13e0791bfc0d20c6b3583da6b"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/decision-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-on-successive-versions-of-a-harmonised-standard\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on successive versions of a harmonised standard"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/","name":"Eurogip","description":"Comprendre les risques professionnels en Europe","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/478499d13e0791bfc0d20c6b3583da6b","name":"Thomas","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1d4c181e1a496d3d6d25441adb6830a23883e0f93ed97a30e4616fea3c950268?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1d4c181e1a496d3d6d25441adb6830a23883e0f93ed97a30e4616fea3c950268?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1d4c181e1a496d3d6d25441adb6830a23883e0f93ed97a30e4616fea3c950268?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Thomas"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23310\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eurogip.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}