Standardization|12/02/21

Brexit and standardisation: where do we stand?

Home > The news of EUROGIP and occupational risks in Europe > Brexit and standardisation: where do we stand?

This was the title of a web conference organised by French Afnor Normalisation for its members. On the agenda were the changes introduced since 1 January 2021 by the trade and cooperation agreement that took over the organisation of trade between the UK and the EU.

Standardisation is addressed more specifically in the chapter on technical barriers to trade. The three major adaptations introduced by the agreement concern product marking, standards giving presumption of conformity to essential regulatory requirements and bodies accredited for conformity assessment. Thus:

  • The “UKCA marking” (UK Conformity Assessed) marking replaces the “CE” marking for products placed on the English, Welsh and Scottish markets. For Northern Ireland, manufacturers can use either the CE marking or the UK(NI) marking. To facilitate the transition, CE marking alone should continue to be accepted until 1 January 2022 and the UK government has published an explanatory sheet on the transfer between CE and UKCA marking depending on the type of product.
  • The “designated standards” replace the European “harmonised standards” in the new UK legislation. They are standards adopted by a recognised standards body, i.e. CEN, CENELEC or ETSI, but also the British Standards Institution (BSI). They must also be “designated” by a UK Secretary of State. With this system, the United Kingdom is abandoning the logic of harmonisation and is giving itself the means to unilaterally recognise or reject standards chosen at European level to give a presumption of conformity with the regulations.
  • The United Kingdom will deploy its own network of notified bodies to assess the conformity of products placed on the English, Welsh and Scottish markets, the UK Market Conformity Assessment Bodies (UKMCAB).

The BSI, for its part, wishes to continue to participate actively in CEN and CENELEC, retaining all its rights and duties as a Member. It benefits from a derogation. Therefore, it will continue to participate in the work under the same arrangements until 31 December 2021. As a reminder, the BSI is excluded from the second vote count after a formal negative vote in the same way as all non-member countries of the European Economic Area.

Discover other news

Abroad

27/06/24

AUSTRIA: More accidents at work and on the way to work in 2023

According to data published by the Austrian Social insurance for occupational injuries (AUVA) in mid-June, 145,748 claims were registered last year, broken down as follows 29,866 accidents (at work and and students), 13,062 commuting accidents and 2,820 cases of occupational diseases. While the number of accidents (at work and on the way to work) has increased, the number of occupational diseases has decreased compared to 2022.

Abroad

27/06/24

GERMANY: in 2023, the number of fatal accidents at work and commuting accidents was lower than ever before

The number of accidents at work in 2023 to declare was lower than in 2019: 783,426 compared with 871,547. This is a record number if we exclude the years 2020 to 2022, which were heavily influenced by the Covid-19 pandemic. The number of fatal accidents at work and on the way to work was also at an all-time low, and the number of occupational diseases reported and recognised fell sharply.

Abroad

27/06/24

DENMARK: faster processing of workers’ compensation claims

New rules, which come into force on 1 July, are designed to give victims of accidents at work a quicker response to their claim for compensation. From now on, employers, doctors and local authorities will be liable to a fine if they fail to provide information within the statutory time limit, i.e. no later than 14 days after the first day of absence, if the accident has resulted in the employee being unable to work or absent from work after the day of the accident.