Abroad|11/01/17

GREAT-BRITAIN: Inspections on construction sites are increasingly rare

Home > The news of EUROGIP and occupational risks in Europe > GREAT-BRITAIN: Inspections on construction sites are increasingly rare

Labour Inspectors’ checks are increasingly rare in the construction industry, complains Bill Lawrence, a British trade unionist in this sector.

He estimates that 80% of building sites in the UK have never been inspected. “In the past five years, there have been 217 fatalities. However, due to the government’s austerity measures, the number of civil servants having to cover 257,000 companies and 2.1 million workers has been reduced to 132. Between April 2015 and April 2016, only 9,219 inspections were carried out, or 13% less than three years earlier”, adds Bill Lawrence.

Lawrence predicts that by 2019-2020 the budget of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) will have been reduced by half compared with its level of ten years ago. “An insidious commercialization of the Labour Inspectorate is now under way”, he complains. In the past four years, the HSE has been able to charge UK businesses for its services. During a visit to a construction site, if an inspector notes that the safety legislation is not complied with, he can impose fees equivalent to €143 per hour for the time spent investigating, counselling and adopting implementing measures.

Discover other news

News, Standardization

30/11/22

AI and OHS: a look back at the Euroshnet conference in October 2022

Artificial Intelligence (AI) meets Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) was the theme of the 7th EUROSHNET conference which took place in Paris on 20 October and which brought together some 130 OSH experts from the world of standardisation, testing and certification, from 15 countries.

Abroad

23/11/22

ITALY: tumour linked to mobile phone use recognised in PM

The Court of Appeal of Turin has just ruled in favour of a 63-year-old former technician who was seeking recognition as an occupational disease of the benign auricular tumour of which he was a victim for having used his mobile phone at work for at least 2.5 hours a day for 13 years.