Community news|28/02/22

MEPs give their opinion on the strategic framework for OSH in the EU

Home > The news of EUROGIP and occupational risks in Europe > MEPs give their opinion on the strategic framework for OSH in the EU

The European Parliament’s Employment and Social Affairs Committee adopted on 1 February its report on the new EU Strategic Framework for Health and Safety at Work 2021-2027 by a large majority (43 votes in favour, 3 against and 8 abstentions).

“To create safe and healthy workplaces fit for the 21st century, ambitious action is needed, also taking into account the lessons learned from the Covid-19 crisis”. In particular, MEPs call for

  • a European directive on psychosocial risks and well-being at work to combat burnout and stress;
  • a targeted revision of the directive on biological agents to adapt it to pandemic situations
  • the right to disconnect for all workers in the EU.

They call on the European Commission to come forward with a text setting out minimum requirements for telework in the EU while reiterating their call for a directive on the right to disconnect.

The Employment and Social Affairs Committee’s report will be put to a plenary vote in March.

To find out more
Focus on the European Commission’s Strategic Framework 2021-2027

Discover other news

Standardization

17/12/24

Safety and standardisation: focus on continuous handling equipment

Continuous handling systems go beyond simply moving objects. They include actions such as storage, production or order picking. Their use can lead to serious accidents. Preventing such accidents is a priority for the French Occupational Injuries and Diseases Branch (Branche AT/MP), which is playing an active role in standardisation work.

Abroad

10/12/24

SPAIN: new regulations to deal with climate risks

One month after storm Dana claimed the lives of 250 people, Spain is making changes to its labor laws, introducing "paid climatic leave", fleshing out collective agreements and introducing a right to information in the event of meteorological risk.