Community news|28/04/21

The new draft Machinery Regulation is published

Home > The news of EUROGIP and occupational risks in Europe > The new draft Machinery Regulation is published

As part of its 2020 work programme, under the priority “A Europe fit for the digital age”, the European Commission planned to revise the Machinery Directive (Directive 2006/42/EC). It has just published a new draft Regulation. This revision contributes to both the digital transition and the strengthening of the single market.

The evaluation of the Directive showed that the text was generally “relevant, effective, efficient and coherent”. However, it highlighted the need for improvements, specific simplifications and the need to fill a number of gaps.

The general objectives of the Machinery Directive are to ensure not only the free movement of machinery within the internal market but also a high level of protection for users and other exposed persons. The revision aims to solve the following problems:

  • The directive does not sufficiently cover the new risks arising from emerging technologies
    legal uncertainty due to a lack of clarity on the scope and definitions;
  • Possible safety gaps in traditional technologies;
  • Insufficient provisions for high-risk machinery;
  • Monetary and environmental costs due to extensive paper documentation;
  • Inconsistencies with other EU product safety legislation;
  • Differences in interpretation due to transposition.

Draft, annexes and impact assessment

Documents relating to machinery

Discover other news

News, Standardization


AI and OHS: a look back at the Euroshnet conference in October 2022

Artificial Intelligence (AI) meets Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) was the theme of the 7th EUROSHNET conference which took place in Paris on 20 October and which brought together some 130 OSH experts from the world of standardisation, testing and certification, from 15 countries.



ITALY: tumour linked to mobile phone use recognised in PM

The Court of Appeal of Turin has just ruled in favour of a 63-year-old former technician who was seeking recognition as an occupational disease of the benign auricular tumour of which he was a victim for having used his mobile phone at work for at least 2.5 hours a day for 13 years.